- Congress Spokesperson David Eray highlights the risks of unregulated AI tools for human rights.
- Emphasizes the need for strict regulation and human-centered approaches in AI development.
- Calls for multilevel governance collaboration to ensure coherence in legislation and practices.
- Advocates for the integration of a human rights perspective in the design and use of AI systems.
- Welcomes the Council of Europe’s Convention on artificial intelligence as a crucial step towards safeguarding human rights in AI development.
Main AI News:
In a thought-provoking address at the 9th Summit of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), David Eray, the Congress Spokesperson on digitalisation and AI, emphasized the pervasive nature of artificial intelligence (AI) in our lives. Eray, representing Switzerland’s EPP/CCE, cautioned against the unchecked deployment of AI tools, stressing the imperative of assessing them within the framework of human rights and stringent regulation.
Eray articulated the necessity for a cohesive multilevel governance approach to digital transformation. He advocated for collaborative efforts among local, regional, and central governments to ensure coherence in legislation and practices. According to him, such cooperation is pivotal in creating truly ‘smart’ cities and regions that prioritize human-centeredness, respect for human rights, and sustainable development.
Drawing attention to the Congress’s initiatives, Eray referenced their endeavors to foster digital equity and e-inclusion. He specifically mentioned the 2022 report on smart cities and regions, which underscores the importance of empowering individuals to leverage technology for their well-being. Amid the growing concerns surrounding AI, Eray welcomed the Council of Europe’s recent adoption of a binding Convention on artificial intelligence. This landmark treaty, according to Eray, establishes fundamental principles and regulations to safeguard human rights, democracy, and the rule of law in AI’s lifecycle.
Looking ahead, Eray expressed optimism regarding the Convention’s implementation, advocating for the integration of a multilevel governance perspective. This, he believes, is essential for effectively addressing the challenges posed by AI while upholding human rights and democratic values.
Conclusion:
David Eray’s insights underscore the pressing need for robust regulation and governance frameworks to address the risks associated with AI deployment. For businesses operating in the AI market, adherence to human rights principles and collaboration with governmental bodies will be imperative to navigate regulatory landscapes and build trust with stakeholders.
