Advanced Inspection Techniques Boost Confidence in Laser Powder Bed Fusion 3D Printing

TL;DR:

  • ORNL researchers enhance flaw detection in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 3D printing.
  • The method combines post-production inspections with real-time sensor data and machine learning.
  • Achieves a 90% detection rate for flaws, boosting confidence in product safety.
  • Potential to expand additive manufacturing applications and improve product quality.
  • Reduces reliance on costly CT scans and offers design freedom.
  • Opens doors for mass production of complex components.
  • ORNL plans to refine the algorithm for better flaw differentiation.

Main AI News:

Researchers at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have pioneered an enhanced flaw detection method, bolstering confidence in the quality of metal parts produced through laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 3D printing. This groundbreaking advancement holds significant promise for industries such as energy, aerospace, nuclear, and defense, enabling the production of intricate and bespoke components from an array of materials. However, the widespread adoption of LPBF has been hindered by the challenge of conducting thorough and accurate inspections, as conventional methods often fail to uncover flaws embedded deep within printed layers.

ORNL scientists have introduced a revolutionary approach that combines post-production inspection with real-time sensor data collected during the printing process. This amalgamated dataset serves as the foundation for a machine-learning algorithm, enhancing its ability to detect flaws in the final product. Importantly, this framework provides operators with a precise probability estimate of accurate flaw detection, rivaling the reliability of traditional evaluation methods that demand more time and labor.

Luke Scime, a researcher at ORNL, emphasizes the groundbreaking aspect of their work, stating, “We can detect flaw sizes of about half a millimeter—approximately the thickness of a business card—with a 90% success rate.” This level of quantified confidence in in-process flaw detection has far-reaching implications for product safety and reliability.

LPBF, the most widely used metal 3D printing process, employs a high-energy laser to selectively melt metal powder layered onto a build plate. The build plate is then incrementally lowered, allowing for the gradual construction of the desired product. However, engineers have long recognized that inherent flaws are an inevitable part of the manufacturing process.

Zackary Snow, an ORNL researcher, explains, “For traditional manufacturing, we understand the nature of these flaws, where they are likely to occur, and how to identify them. Operators can confidently gauge the probability of detecting flaws of a specific size, ensuring representative sampling.” Yet, the same level of confidence has remained elusive in the realm of 3D printing.

This lack of quantifiable data has posed significant challenges in qualifying and certifying 3D-printed parts, which is considered a major hurdle in additive manufacturing. A recent paper by ORNL researchers and their partner RTX, published in Additive Manufacturing, outlines their innovative process, which achieves a 90% detection rate while reducing the risk of false positives that can result in the disposal of otherwise good products.

The research began with RTX, an aerospace and defense company, designing a part similar to one it already manufactures, thereby creating opportunities to simulate realistic flaws. RTX proceeded to 3D-print the part multiple times, continuously monitoring the process using both a standard near-infrared camera and an additional visible-light camera. Subsequently, both RTX and ORNL researchers conducted post-production quality inspections utilizing X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans.

Working in consultation with RTX, ORNL’s additive manufacturing experts transformed the data into a layered stack of images, essentially forming the educational basis for the machine-learning algorithm. During the training phase, the algorithm made initial attempts at labeling flaws based on the CT scan images, with human operators providing further annotations based on visual cues from the printing process. Continuous human feedback aids in training the software, progressively improving its ability to identify flaws. Leveraging previous advancements in in-situ monitoring and deep-learning frameworks by ORNL, this approach ultimately reduces the need for extensive human intervention in the inspection process.

As Zackary Snow notes, “This allows CT-level confidence without CT.” Traditional CT imaging and analysis, while effective, incur additional costs and require specialized expertise. Moreover, CT scanning struggles to penetrate dense metals, limiting its applicability.

When applied consistently to a single design produced with the same material and process, the algorithm rapidly learns to provide consistent quality analysis within days. Simultaneously, the software accumulates knowledge from various designs and constructions, enabling it to accurately inspect products with unfamiliar designs over time.

The ORNL-developed inspection framework holds the potential to revolutionize additive manufacturing applications. With statistically validated quality control, 3D printing could become a viable option for mass-producing items such as automobile components. Furthermore, it could broaden the scope of parts amenable to 3D printing, offering designers greater freedom in their creations. This development is crucial, given the industry’s shift toward larger print volumes and faster print rates, leading to larger parts with varying types of flaws.

Brian Fisher, senior principal engineer for additive manufacturing at RTX’s Raytheon Technologies Research Center, underscores the significance of this advancement, stating, “With additive manufacturing, we can produce large, highly complex parts using dense materials, which traditionally would be difficult and costly to inspect thoroughly. This can potentially save time and money, making a compelling business case for large assemblies.”

In the next phase of their research, the ORNL team will focus on training the deep-learning algorithm to better differentiate between different irregularities and categorize flaws resulting from multiple causes. This continued innovation promises to elevate the reliability and versatility of additive manufacturing, positioning it as a transformative force in modern production processes.

Conclusion:

The advanced inspection method developed by ORNL has the potential to revolutionize the additive manufacturing market. Achieving a 90% detection rate for flaws in metal 3D printing significantly boosts confidence in product safety and reliability. This breakthrough reduces the reliance on costly CT scans, broadens the scope of 3D-printed parts, and paves the way for mass production of complex components. As a result, additive manufacturing is poised to become a more viable and cost-effective option for a wide range of industries, ultimately driving its growth and adoption in the market.

Source