English High Court overturns UK Patent Office decision, enabling patenting of AI technology in the UK

TL;DR:

  • English High Court changes UK law, allowing patenting of AI technology.
  • Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and their training are now patentable in the UK.
  • AI Venture Studio TMC2 and subsidiary EP AI drive this transformation.
  • UK aims to become a global AI leader.
  • Positive implications for the AI industry, especially in finance and markets.
  • Expert voices praise the legal shift as a game-changer.

Main AI News:

In a groundbreaking development within the United Kingdom, the English High Court has enacted a transformative legal shift, effectively overturning a prior ruling by the UK Patent Office (UKIPO) concerning the patentability of pivotal aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. This pivotal alteration in legislation signifies that the training of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and the ANNs themselves are now officially eligible for patent protection in the UK. ANNs play a pivotal role in the realm of AI and machine learning, orchestrating user experiences that mimic human-like sentience through technological means.

This remarkable initiative has been championed by the AI Venture Studio, Time Machine Capital Squared (TMC2), and its subsidiary entity, Emotional Perception AI Ltd (EP AI). In 2019, EP AI initially filed a patent application for an innovative technique designed to enable trained ANNs to align their outputs more closely with the semantic perception of content as perceived by humans. Regrettably, this initial application faced rejection, as the existing legislation, which dated back to the 1970s, was ill-equipped to accommodate the complexities of contemporary computer-implemented inventions. Nevertheless, the rapid global advancement of AI technology has underscored the urgency of revising this archaic legal framework.

EP AI contends that the UKIPO had been reluctant to depart from entrenched notions concerning the patentability of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs). Such innovations in computing have served as cornerstones for numerous 21st-century technology companies. TMC2, with its ambitious vision to become the premier AI Venture Studio beyond the borders of the United States, boasts a portfolio of 12 AI enterprises, collectively holding more than 100 national intellectual property rights within the United States.

Professor Andy Pardoe, an esteemed advisor to TMC2, articulated his perspective on this momentous legal transformation: “This alteration in UK law, specifically tailored to AI-based patents, constitutes a monumental stride forward for the UK’s AI sector, significantly bolstering the nation’s aspirations to emerge as a global leader in this field. The distinction drawn between the intricate nuances of training an ANN as opposed to merely running one for inference purposes reflects a profound comprehension of the technical facets underpinning AI development and deployment. The revision of our legal framework to facilitate the approval of AI-based patents is an exceptionally positive advancement.

The repercussions of this judicial ruling hold immense promise for the UK’s burgeoning AI industry, rendering it a more enticing prospect for investment in pioneering firms and research and development endeavors that will propel the AI domain to greater heights. Pardoe emphasizes the particular relevance of this transformation in markets and financial sectors, where novel emotional perception technologies are being harnessed for natural language processing (NLP), economic and financial crime detection, and sentiment analysis.

Bruce Dearling, the patent attorney representing TMC2, emphasized, “Closing the semantic gap stands as a paramount objective within the realm of AI technology. The ramifications of this verdict, coupled with any associated patents, cannot be understated, chiefly because it clarifies the criteria by which AI and CII inventions should be assessed. Furthermore, it acknowledges the visionary brilliance of the inventors, positioning them squarely at the forefront of innovation. This decision should be met with enthusiasm by all stakeholders, including the UK Patent Office. It signals that the UKPLC is now unequivocally open for business in AI and, indeed, in other industrial sectors that leverage computer-implemented inventions. Safeguarding intellectual property rights is of paramount importance to industry.”

Joe Lyske, the co-founder of TMC2 and co-author of the patented technology, expressed his satisfaction, stating, “We are profoundly gratified by this landmark ruling. Our achievement here extends beyond the acquisition of another patent for TMC2; it marks a transformative moment for the entire AI industry. It reaffirms, once more, that the United Kingdom stands as a global vanguard in AI, and we take immense pride in this recognition.

Conclusion:

The UK High Court’s pivotal decision to permit the patenting of AI technology, including ANNs and their training, heralds a significant milestone for the nation’s AI sector. This legal transformation not only modernizes outdated laws but also positions the UK as an attractive hub for AI innovation and investment. Particularly in markets such as finance and natural language processing, this change is poised to drive substantial advancements, reinforcing the UK’s status as a global leader in AI.

Source