TL;DR:
- Copyleaks has launched an AI-powered tool to reduce grading bias in ed-tech
- The AI Grader is particularly useful for high-volume grading scenarios
- Grading biases among human educators can impact a student’s academic progress
- Copyleaks’ AI Grader mitigates grading bias and inconsistency
- Inconsistencies from grading bias can lead to a 6 percent difference in grades given by different human graders
- The AI Grader produced results within a 2 percent margin, making it a highly accurate and effective solution
- Automating the grading process provides consistent and objective grading for all students
- The AI Grader could help education systems provide fairer assessments that are free from subjective biases.
Main AI News:
As AI-driven ed-tech tools become more prevalent in the academic sector, their applications are expanding beyond student integrity to include grading as well. Copyleaks, an ed-tech platform specializing in anti-plagiarism and grading solutions, has recently launched a new AI-powered tool aimed at addressing the potential for human biases to impact the grading process.
Alon Yamin, CEO and co-founder of Copyleaks stated that the platform’s AI-detection functions have already been successful in identifying instances of generative AI usage by students for assignments. However, as human graders are not immune to biases and external factors that could impact their grading consistency, the company has developed an additional AI-driven solution to address these discrepancies.
Yamin emphasized that their new AI Grader is particularly useful for high-volume grading scenarios, where human graders may be grading thousands or even millions of exams. By automating the grading process, Copyleaks aims to eliminate the potential for subjective biases and provide consistent and objective grading for all students.
According to Yamin, Copyleaks has a large user base in the U.S. education market, grading approximately 10 million documents per month. Kinsey Rawe, senior vice president and general manager of Courseware and Instructional Services for Imagine Learning, praised Copyleaks’ new tool for its potential to save educators precious time and provide more personalized instruction to students while also reinforcing the importance of academic integrity.
Research has shown that grading biases among human educators can impact a student’s academic progress, with teachers being more likely to rate writing from white students as being at or above grade level compared to identical writing from a Black student. Anti-bias training has had limited success in reducing such grading biases.
However, hiring multiple graders for each exam is a costly and time-consuming solution that some education systems have turned to. Copyleaks, an ed-tech platform specializing in anti-plagiarism and grading solutions, has developed an AI-powered grading tool that effectively mitigates grading bias and inconsistency.
Shouvik Paul, Chief Operating Officer of Copyleaks, noted that inconsistencies from grading bias could lead to a 6 percent difference in grades given by different human graders for the same work. However, in A/B testing, the AI Grader produced results within a 2 percent margin, making it a highly accurate and effective solution for mitigating grading bias.
By automating the grading process and providing consistent and objective grading for all students, Copyleaks’ AI Grader could help education systems provide fairer assessments that are free from subjective biases.
Conlcusion:
The development of Copyleaks’ AI Grader for reducing grading bias in ed-tech provides an innovative solution for education systems to ensure consistent and objective grading for all students. The potential for eliminating subjective biases and improving the accuracy and efficiency of grading has significant implications for the market, particularly in high-volume grading scenarios. As the use of AI-driven ed-tech tools continues to expand, Copyleaks’ development of the AI Grader underscores the growing demand for fairer and more reliable assessments in the academic sector.
