The survey by Intelligent.com: 80% of educational institutions plan to adopt AI in their admissions by 2024

TL;DR:

  • 80% of educational institutions plan to adopt AI in their admissions by 2024.
  • 56% of institutions already use AI in their admissions processes.
  • Public and large schools are more likely to embrace AI than private or smaller institutions.
  • AI is primarily used for reviewing recommendation letters, transcripts, and applicant communication.
  • The key motivations for AI adoption include efficiency enhancement, informed decision-making, and bias reduction.
  • Despite the potential to reduce bias, 65% of respondents express ethical concerns about AI in admissions.

Main AI News:

In a landscape where education meets technology, the path forward is clear: AI will play a central role in the admissions processes of educational institutions. A recent survey by Intelligent.com, a trusted online authority on degree rankings and higher education strategies, highlights this transformative journey. The survey delves deep into the minds of education professionals, 399 in total, who possess an intricate knowledge of their schools’ admissions intricacies.

The revelation is striking. A staggering 80% of educational institutions are poised to incorporate Artificial Intelligence (AI) into their admissions systems by the year 2024. This shift is monumental, signifying a pivotal moment in the evolution of education. The future is now, and it’s intelligent.

The statistics speak volumes. Presently, 56% of respondents affirm that their institutions are already harnessing the power of AI in their admissions procedures. An additional 7% reveal plans to join the AI revolution by the end of the current year, while 19% anticipate doing so by 2024. A cautious 5% project their adoption to be realized in 2025 or beyond, while only 13% remain steadfast in their resistance to AI integration.

Unveiling further layers of insight, we observe that the adoption of AI in admissions is not uniform. The distinction becomes apparent among respondents affiliated with higher education. Larger, publicly-funded institutions show greater enthusiasm for AI adoption compared to their private, medium-sized, or smaller counterparts. This trend underscores the transformative potential of AI in reshaping the educational landscape.

Professor Diane Gayeski, an authority in higher education, emphasizes the magnitude of this transformation, stating, “This survey underscores a pivotal shift in how institutions evaluate student applications, including essays, transcripts, and recommendations. Gone are the days of painstaking manual reviews by seasoned admissions experts. With the avalanche of applications, institutions now rely on AI-driven scoring tools, often managed by temporary staff.”

Diving into the specifics, 73% of respondents from institutions already utilizing AI confirm its application in the ‘evaluation of letters of recommendation.’ Meanwhile, 71% employ AI to scrutinize transcripts, and 61% employ it as a communication channel with applicants.

In the realm of forthcoming AI adopters, 63% plan to leverage AI for ‘transcript assessment,’ closely followed by 55% who intend to deploy it for ‘evaluating letters of recommendation.’ Additionally, 54% plan to employ AI for ‘applicant communication.’

The driving force behind this seismic shift in admissions practices is crystal clear. Respondents express a collective desire to enhance efficiency, make informed decisions, and eradicate bias from the admissions process. Remarkably, despite the consensus on AI’s potential to mitigate bias, 65% of respondents harbor concerns about the ethical implications of this technological leap.

This groundbreaking survey, commissioned by Intelligent.com and conducted through the Pollfish survey platform, commenced on September 6, 2023. The participation of 399 respondents ensured the survey’s robustness. Stringent eligibility criteria were enforced, with all participants aged 25 or older, gainfully employed in the education sector, and boasting a minimum annual household income of $50,000. Furthermore, respondents were meticulously screened, with inclusion limited to those intimately acquainted with their institutions’ admissions practices.

Conclusion:

The survey’s findings signal a transformative shift in the education market. The widespread adoption of AI in admissions processes reflects a commitment to efficiency and fairness. Educational institutions that embrace AI are likely to gain a competitive edge in attracting prospective students. However, ethical considerations and potential biases demand continuous scrutiny, requiring the market to prioritize transparency and accountability in AI implementation.

Source